In a sport where consistency is king, the Los Angeles Dodgers have become synonymous with postseason dominance, but it wasn't always this way. A forgotten chapter in their illustrious history reveals a different narrative.
The year was 2013, and the Dodgers, a team we now perceive as perennial contenders, were in a less familiar position. They had just ended a playoff drought, thanks to the arrival of Yasiel Puig and Zack Greinke, who ignited a spark in a franchise that had been missing the postseason for four long years. But this Dodgers squad lacked the depth that would become their trademark in later years.
The stage was set for a captivating series against the Atlanta Braves, a team with more recent playoff experience. The Braves boasted a formidable lineup, finishing second in slugging percentage in the National League. However, their strength was about to be tested by one of the game's greats.
Enter Clayton Kershaw, the reigning Cy Young Award winner, who took the mound in Game 1. This was a time when starting pitchers were expected to go the distance, and Kershaw did just that, delivering a performance that modern-day aces might struggle to match. He fired a staggering 124 pitches, a number that would raise eyebrows in today's game, where pitch counts are meticulously monitored.
Kershaw's dominance was on full display in the first inning. He struck out Jason Heyward and Freddie Freeman, showcasing his signature slider that left batters helpless. This was a pitcher at the peak of his powers, armed with a 95-mph fastball that he no longer possesses.
The Dodgers' offense supported Kershaw's efforts, scoring in three consecutive innings to take a commanding lead. But the Braves weren't going down without a fight. With the score 5-1, Andrelton Simmons threatened to rally his team, but Kershaw's slider, once again, proved to be the difference-maker.
But here's where it gets controversial. Kershaw was called upon to pitch on short rest in Game 4, a decision that might spark debate among baseball purists. Was this a strategic move or a sign of desperation? The Dodgers, leading the series, could have opted for a well-rested pitcher, but they chose Kershaw, who delivered six solid innings.
This series marked the beginning of Kershaw's impact on the Dodgers' success. His performance in the 2013 playoffs, particularly against the Braves, set a precedent for his prime years. Although the Dodgers fell short in the NLCS, Kershaw's role in their journey cannot be understated.
And this is the part most people miss—Kershaw's ability to adapt. As his career progressed, he lost that blazing fastball but gained wisdom and precision. His 13-strikeout performance in 2020, seven years after this series, is a testament to his longevity and evolution.
So, what's your take? Was the decision to pitch Kershaw on short rest a calculated risk or a controversial move? How do you think Kershaw's legacy compares to other Cy Young winners? Share your thoughts and keep the conversation going!
